21st-Century Skills Development Through STE(A)M Education – Key Benefits and Implementation Challenges

 

As we know from the previous article about STEM/STEAM, the term is an acronym for Science, Technology, Engineering, (Arts) and Math. It refers to these specific fields of study, as well as the integration of these disciplines for educational growth and strategic development. Throughout human history, these fields have evolved with increasing speed and organisation, mainly from the Modern Age. More recently, they have assumed a central role in social and economic development. The term STEM was coined by Dr. Charles Vela, engineer and educator, during his research into the lives of great scientists; he noticed they shared several common traits: visualisation, intuition, pattern recognition, modelling, conceptualisation, abstraction, synthesis, command of mathematics, and subject matter expertise.  Then, he decided to develop an educational framework that would integrate these qualities through STEM fields, focusing on student group work. In 1991, Vela established the STEM Institute and launched two fellowships: Young Engineer and Scientist Program (YESP) to prepare students, and the Young Educators Program (YEP) for educators.

Later, STEM was integrated into U.S. national educational curriculum, with the goal of strengthening and modernising the workforce while reducing social inequality. Following this lead, many other countries launched similar initiatives, investing heavily in their own STEM programs. Over time, due to its capacity for integrative learning, several variations of STEM emerged. Some of these incorporate new disciplines, such as Arts (STEAM), Medicine (STEMM) and Chinese culture (C-STEAM). In other cases, STEM education is used as a pedagogic tool to teach specific subjects like Science, Math or History. Additionally, STEM is applied independently, focusing purely on the integration of its four core fields.

The inclusion of the Arts into STEM aims to stimulate creativity and motivation, while improving student engagement, resulting in the STEAM variation. The artistic creative process helps students develop long-term problem-solving skills, strengthening their focus, confidence, creativity, connection with peers and the world around them. By integrating mindsets and skills of the Arts and STEM, students also learn how to defend their ideas,  connect different fields of knowledge, and consciously apply these shared habits to real-world situations. STEM projects activate several cognitive processes that are essential for intellectual development:
    • Planning;
    • Interpretation;
    • Ideas connections;
    • Verbal and non-verbal reasoning;
    • Memory.

Beyond subject-specific skills - such as logical thinking, creativity, and algorithmic thinking - STEM/STEAM education also stimulates transversal competencies. Furthermore, it significantly increases students’ motivation toward their classes and the overall learning process. Some of the most cited benefits include:
    • Promoting lifelong learning;
    • Enhancing collaboration and communication through group work;
    • Supporting teachers in planning activities;
    • Fostering intellectual, emotional and social development;
    • Improving positive emotions and emotion regulation, leading to fewer behavioral issues;
    • Strengthening critical investigation and thinking;
    • Boosting motivation, confidence, satisfaction, content/focus retention;
    • Improving academic grades;
    • Increasing performance across different subject areas.

STEM/STEAM education offers benefits at various learning levels, from the initial K-12 years to higher education. By working with projects that explore real-life problems, it stimulates student engagement and encourages the application of concepts learned throughout the course, while also updating their prior knowledge. In higher education, where there is a large volume of concepts to learn in a short time, this integration of knowledge offers a valuable opportunity for students to self-test and create strategies to overcome difficulties, while also improving both academic and personal skills.

The challenges of STEM/STEAM education include adequate teacher training and well-prepared school infrastructure, as well as effective curricular integration. Some of the most cited challenges are:
    • Curriculum adaptation;
    • Time management;
    • Resource limitations;
    • Teachers and assistants training;
    • Balance between project goals and difficulty levels;
    • School infrastructure;
    • Programs that claim to be STEM/STEAM but rarely apply true interdisciplinary methods.

Meta-analises point to the US, China, and other developed nations as leaders in STEM research production: together, they are responsible for the majority of global publications. We can also observe an increase in scientific production regarding STEM education, particularly in subtopics such as ‘teaching and learning’ and ‘curriculum and educational politcs creation’. These trends point efforts to overcome two of the main challenges in STEM education: teacher training and curriculum adaptation. Consequently, new frameworks are being developed, and working groups are being formed to share knowledge between teachers and researchers, strengthening the bridges between classroom practices and academic research.

We can conclude that STEM/STEAM has grown as an educational tool, and with conciousness about 21st-century social demands growing, both educators and societal leaders have strengthened efforts in this direction. The studies demonstrate significant benefits from STEM/STEAM methods versus traditional methods, both in student performance and motivation. There is also a trend for growing research in that area, many of these studies are qualitative, contributing to educational practices and making STEM/STEAM even more present in students’ reality. That said, we can expect in the coming years a growing presence of people with more creativity, integrated thinking, teamwork and communication skills.

Author’s Note: Although I initially planned to write just three parts, this series has evolved into an ongoing exploration of STEM/STEAM education. In the future, we will dive deeper into the STEM world, its practices, trends, and history. Which part of STE(A)M should I cover next? Let me know in the comments and stay tuned for more!

Bibliography

[01] Ashish Saseendran, Mary Vineetha Thomas. Design thinking in science and integrated STEM/STEAM education: Trends, challenges, and future directions from a systematic review[J]. STEM Education, 2025, 5(6): 1058-1101. doi: 10.3934/steme.2025046

[02] Huser, Joyce et al (2020). STEAM and the Role of the Arts in STEM. New York: State Education Agency Directors of Arts Education.

[03] Mcdonald, Christine V. (2016). STEM Education: A review of the contribution of the disciplines of science, technology, engineering and mathematics. Science Education International. 27. 530-569.

[04] Prado, J. L. do, Quintela, M. D. de, & Mariano, R. de S. (2024). Uma análise sobre STEM e engenharia: uma revisão sistemática da literatura. Caderno Pedagógico, 21(7), e5330. https://doi.org/10.54033/cadpedv21n7-004

[05] Teh Faradilla Abdul Rahman, Zazaleena Binti Zakariah, Nurhilyana Binti Anuar, Zakiah Binti Noh, Nawal Binti Abdul Razak (2025), International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), Vol. 9, Issue 01, Pages 3172-3182, DOI: https://doi.org/https://dx.doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.9010257

[06] M, Ramadhevi & Prakash, S.. (2025). Global trends in stem education research (2000–2018): A systematic journal-based study. Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology. 9. 369-381. 10.55214/2576-8484.v9i8.9306.

[07] White, D., & Delaney, S. (2021). Full STEAM ahead, but who has the map? – A PRISMA systematic review on the incorporation of interdisciplinary learning into schools. LUMAT: International Journal on Math, Science and Technology Education, 9(2), 9–32. https://doi.org/10.31129/LUMAT.9.2.1387

[08] REZENDE, B. D. F.; ALVARENGA, K. B. STEAM na Educação em Ciências e Matemática: uma análise dos principais estudos sobre a abordagem. Revemop, v. 5, p. e202321, 26 dez. 2023. https://doi.org/10.33532/revemop.e202321

[09] Rahim, R. A., & Mahmud, S. N. D. (2025). Integrating the Engineering Design Process (EDP) in Stem Classroom: A Systematic Literature Review of Impacts and Challenges. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 14(3), 1661–1679. http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARPED/v14-i3/26304

[10] Amanova, Aray K., Laura A. Butabayeva, Galiya A. Abayeva, Akerke N. Umirbekova, Saltanat K. Abildina, and Airegim A. Makhmetova. "A systematic review of the implementation of STEAM education in schools". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2025 21 no. 1 (2025): em2568. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/15894

[11] - Eshaq, Hassan A.. "The effect of using STEM education on students’ mathematics achievement". Journal of Pedagogical Research 2024 8 no. 1 (2024): 75-82. https://doi.org/10.33902/JPR.202423476

[12] Pires, Pedro F E V. “Educação STEAM na promoção do Design Thinking e da Criatividade dos alunos”. Universidade de Lisboa. 2024.

[13] Vela, Charles V. “ORIGEN, CONCEPT AND PRACTICE OF STEM”. 2021. https://afilon.org/charles-vela-the-origin-of-stem/

[14] Weyer, Matt; Dell’Erba, Mary. “Research and Policy Implications of STEAM Education for Young Students” Education Comission of the States. 2022.

[15] Jung Han. “The Impact of Integrated STEM Instruction on Students’ Engineering Design Learning and 21st Century skills”. Purdue University. 2021.

[16] Yu Xie; F, Michael; Shauman, K. STEM Education. Annual Review of Sociology. 2015.

[17] Zhan, Z., Niu, S. Subject integration and theme evolution of STEM education in K-12 and higher education research. Humanit Soc Sci Commun 10, 781 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-02303-8 

[18] Vasquez, Jo Anne. STEM lesson essentials, grades 3-8 : integrating science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Portsmouth, NH : Heinemann. 2013.

[19] Kazu, I Y; Yalçin, K. The Effect of Stem Education on Academic Performance: A Meta-Analysis Study. TOJET. 2021.

[20] Li, Y., Wang, K., Xiao, Y. et al. Research and trends in STEM education: a systematic review of journal publications. IJ STEM Ed 7, 11 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00207-6

[21] Noris, M., Saputro, S., & Ulimaz, A. (2023). STEM research trends from 2013 to 2022: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Technology in Education (IJTE), 6(2), 224-237. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijte.390